Clinical teams don’t need more content—they need trustworthy, citable learning that fits into real work. Podcasts already meet clinicians where they are; the next step is to make them reliably evidence-based and CME-ready.

Why podcasts matter in medical education

(and what’s still missing)

Across specialties, podcasts have become a top resource for residents and are increasingly integrated into formal curricula. A scoping review of 62 studies found learners value podcasts for portability and efficiency; knowledge retention with podcasts is non-inferior to traditional methods; and many listeners report practice changes after listening. However, few studies assess system-level or patient outcomes—highlighting the need for standards that tighten methodological rigor and transparency.

Multiple trials summarized in the literature show podcast-based learning can equal or exceed text or lecture for knowledge gains, and that interpolated questions improve retention—again reinforcing the medium’s feasibility while underscoring the need for good design.

What “Evidence-Based Podcasting™” means

A practical path forward is Evidence-Based Podcasting™ (EBP): a certification model that ports established EBP methods into audio. Working definition: each certified episode integrates current best evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values; cites peer-reviewed sources; and undergoes pre-publication peer review by ≥2 licensed clinicians. Episodes carry a reference packet (PICO/PICOT where relevant, critical appraisals) and communicate certainty using GRADE. A persistent “EBP-ID” links audio to sources and the peer-review record—akin to a DOI for audio.

Why a certification (not just “best practices”)? It (1) signals rigor to time-pressed clinicians, (2) standardizes structure so local EBP work can be disseminated in a reusable, recognizable format, and (3) accelerates adoption by meeting learners “in their earbuds” without sacrificing quality.

How EBP-Certified audio maps to CME/CPD

Accredited providers are already expanding to creative CME formats (e.g., social media learning) that can supplement traditional activities or stand alone; such activities are submitted under the “Other” format in ACS’s CME application. Podcasts fit naturally here when they meet documentation and evaluation requirements (learning objectives, disclosures, assessment, and outcomes). ACS

An operational EBP certification workflow mirrors journal peer review: submission with disclosures and citations; editorial screening; assignment of two independent licensed reviewers; dual review for content and method (including GRADE judgments); revision; acceptance with EBP-ID; labeled publication; and a living-updates policy. These steps make alignment with CME platforms and PARS reporting straightforward.

Design principles that improve learning

Evidence and user studies point to practical design choices:

• Structure & length: keep episodes tight, with clear segmenting and end-of-show summaries; ideal duration varies by task, but <30 minutes often suits focused learning.
• Active learning: embed questions (pre/post or interpolated) to improve retention.
• Credibility signals: disclose conflicts; cite primary literature; explain acronyms; and provide a show page with references, learning objectives, and key takeaways.
• Access & inclusion: publish transcripts and reference packets; consider visuals in show notes for visually oriented learners.
• Assessment & follow-through: pair audio with brief quizzes and “commitment to change” prompts to track competence and behavior change—outcomes repeatedly reported in the literature.

From “edutainment” to accountable learning

The Academic Medicine review documents that learners enjoy podcasts and frequently change practice after listening, but the field lacks consistent outcome measurement. EBP certification closes that gap by demanding traceable sources, formal peer review, and update policies—raising podcasts from “helpful media” to accountable scholarly output that can plug directly into CME/CPD.

What this unlocks (for educators, systems, and industry)

• Faster dissemination with quality control. During fast-moving clinical scenarios, podcasts have shown unique value for rapid knowledge sharing; certification adds guardrails without losing speed.
• CME-ready micro-learning. Certified episodes can be bundled into longitudinal series, paired with brief assessments, and submitted under creative CME formats as “Other.”
• Implementation science at scale. With EBP-IDs and living-update policies, episodes become citable, versioned artifacts that can be referenced in guidelines, journal clubs, and QI initiatives—bridging classroom knowledge to bedside change.
• Equity and access. Audio lowers access barriers for rural and shift-based clinicians; transcripts and references support different learning preferences. The literature shows high uptake across trainee levels and specialties.
• A pragmatic blueprint to start

1. Pick topics where audio adds value (clinical controversies, updates, case-based discussions). 2) Adopt the EBP packet (PICO/T, top studies, critical appraisal, GRADE summary). 3) Run dual peer review (licensed pharmacists/physicians with domain expertise). 4) Publish with an EBP-ID and a labeled episode page (objectives, references, disclosures, quiz, completion certificate). 5) Report to CME as “Other” creative activity if credit is offered; collect learner reactions, knowledge checks, and 30–90-day behavior data.

The bottom line

• Podcasting has earned its place in medical education. The evidence says it works for knowledge, is valued by learners, and can influence practice. What the field needs now is a standard that makes audio auditable. Evidence-Based Podcasting™—with peer review, transparent documentation, and clear labeling—provides that standard and aligns cleanly with emerging CME pathways for creative formats. If we build to this bar, podcasts can move from “popular” to proven, becoming a core channel for trustworthy, updatable clinical education.

---

• References (selected)

• Kelly JM, Perseghin A, Dow AW, et al. Learning Through Listening: A Scoping Review of Podcast Use in Medical Education. Acad Med. 2022;97(7):1079–1085 (HHS Public Access, 2024).

• Okonski J, et al. Podcasting as a Learning Tool in Medical Education: Prior to and During the Pandemic Period. Balkan Med J. 2022;39:334–341.

• Eury T. The Case for Evidence-Based Podcasting™: Why Healthcare Needs a Certification Standard—and How We’re Building It. LinkedIn article. Definition, workflow, and rationale for certification.

• American College of Surgeons (ACS). Creative CME Activity Formats—guidance for accredited “Other” formats that include innovative/social media-based learning.